The
phrase “the shot heard around the world” officially has new meaning. The phrase, which originally referred to the
opening of the American Revolutionary War, now holds new meaning and a new
threat. With the emergence of the 3-D
printer, there were many skeptical people whom speculated the dangers of a 3-D
printer. The printer can print out 3-D objects from plastic and one of the
biggest ethical dilemmas was the possibility of printing weapons. Cody Wilson has achieved the task of printing
one of these weapons. After about a year
of manufacturing with a 3-D printer of his own, he has created a handgun that
shoots off .380 caliber bullets. My
original thoughts when reading about Cody printing the world’s first printed
handgun were that the people who were skeptical were crazy. I thought that nobody would waste a year nor
the ten thousand dollars (at least for one of the cheapest models) for the
opportunity to wield just a handgun. I
would have been more worried if it was producing bombs, automatic machine guns,
biological viruses, etc. Still, I
understand the worry revolved around a technology that prints objects for
anyone who owns it.
Is a company who begins to sell 3D printers to
the general public responsible for the attacks that the costumer may
inflict? This leads us back to the very
controversial topic of gun control where one of the opposition’s strongest
points is that “guns don’t kill people, the people who use them do”. I believe the 3D printer companies would
therefore make a similar argument that the printer itself does no harm. The United States government does not allow
printers like the ones that print our currency to be sold or even created on
the market, so neither should they allow a printer that has an endless amount
of printing capabilities to be available for the general public. The possibility of any person creating guns
in his or her own home is more threatening than the same person printing
counterfeit money. The bills Americans
use every day are changed so often and those changes are kept so secret that is
nearly impossible to intercept one of the algorithms that produces paper
money. On the other hand, it is not
nearly as difficult to print a handgun with a 3D printer as it is to steal the
algorithms and obtain possession of a paper money printer.
One of the biggest threats of a
handgun produced by a 3D printer is that it is incapable of being discovered by
a metal detector. This poses a huge
threat to society today mostly because many of the checks the American
government has enacted are thwarted by a person with a 3D printer. To purchase a gun, a person needs to have a license
and a background check. With a 3D printer, all a person needs is plastic to
produce a handgun. To board enter
security buildings such as an airport, an individual must have all of his or
her bags scanned and walk through a metal detector. Now, it is possible to pass through the metal
detector with a gun and not be detected.
The safety of society is one of the most important questions that should
be raised in considering the release of the 3D printer to the general public.
No comments:
Post a Comment