This past week, I was fortunate enough to be able to attend
the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing in Minneapolis. This
celebration focuses on encouraging women to pursue careers in the computing
sciences and it provides education on this topic (among many others) as well as
a variety of opportunities for networking.
During my time here, I have learned some very interesting
aspects of how the roles of women in computing have changed over the years.
Originally, computer science was dominated by women. During the second world
war, women would run the computers. It wasn’t until men realized that there was
so much more to be done in this field that women were pushed out of the field. In more recent years, it
has become clear that computer science is the one of the ONLY fields in which
the percentage of women has decreased as time has progressed; 2013 having some
of the lowest percentages of women in computer science than ever.
Through the various different speakers at Grace Hopper,
there have been many different reasons for this. Sheryl Sandberg (writer of “Lean In” and chief
operating officer of Facebook) was the keynote speaker on the first morning of
the conference and she very intensely discussed this issue. In one anecdote,
she explained to the audience how two men responded to why they don’t hire as
many young women. The first, stating the most women are “not like Sheryl,”
meaning that they do not take opportunities to step up and are weak. The second
stated “well my wife is afraid I will sleep with them, and I probably would.”
Both statements are equally offensive (in my opinion). The
first indicates that women do not try and do not want to succeed. The
assumptions that women do not want to succeed are clearly incorrect. As
demonstrated by the increased efforts of many women in trying to pursue careers
(in all fields) over the last 30, or so, years clearly contradicts this idea.
Further, the issue that arises with women is that many women begin to believe
the stereotype of a woman after hearing it for so long. Women begin to believe
that they have to have children, and they have to take time off in order to
take care of these children. If they do not stop working, they are considered
bad mothers. Meanwhile, if a father does not stop working while he is raising a
child, he is rarely considered a bad father. Therefore, women do not avoid
success. Women do what they can to work towards success, but the difficulties
of society can make that an exhausting task.
The statement of the second gentleman is shockingly blunt,
but in some cases, very true and very honest. In modern times, it is still very
common for women to be perceived as sexual objects (and yes, this can be the
case for men as well). As a result, it can be difficult for some to see women
as equals and as good in business or the sciences, but also a sexual play
thing. When the objectification of human beings as a whole can stop, equality
across the board will prevail..
Although this issue was not touched upon by Sheryl, I also
believe that in some educational institutions, women do not receive the support
they need in order to continue on in the computing sciences. Speaking from
personal experiences, being a female in a male dominated major at a male
dominated school can be very intimidating. It is not uncommon for me to feel
like the least intelligent person in the room, even if this is not the case. By
encouraging more women into the computer science fields, women will have a
stronger support system within the major and will have a less likely chance of
dropout.
In conclusion, women need more encouragement, support, and
respect, and they will be successful in the computing sciences. The
intelligence is there, and with the appropriate support success will follow.
Further, I am really looking forward to hearing how some
males at Stevens feel about women in the Computer Science at this school, as
well as in general.
No comments:
Post a Comment