In the society dominated by garage start-ups, the merits of the
self-starting genius entrepreneur are highly lauded, and rightly so. These men
built their companies from nothing out of sheet genius. However similar to the
way in which Hollywood takes the art of acting and turns it into reality TV
studded paparazzi madness, Silicon Valley has turned the concept of the genius
self-starter into almost a cult. The term ‘college dropout’ has become a badge
of honor to be worn around Silicon Valley, along with your little black patent cubes and your Google glasses.
src: xkcd.com/971 |
This society has built itself up on the ideals that
technology is the be-all-end-all answer to all the worlds questions. For every
problem, for every issue of modern life, there is an app for that. The more
that technology takes over and solves problems for us, the less we feel we need
to know. It is no longer important to memorize material, the internet has it
right there! We as a society have become obsessed with the quickest, newest,
sleekest technology on the market.
There is no end to articles expounding on the virtues of
teaching programming and technology in schools today. These arguments are all good and well in the theoretical world, teaching
student actual practical skills instead of the archaic knowledge we currently
impart on them, but perhaps this is not the case. These days technology is the
‘in’ trend and up-to-the-second real-time information overload is the name of
the game, what if classical knowledge is being left behind?
This generation (and those surrounding it) is becoming
preoccupied with the merits of technology and determined to dismiss anything
not reliant on the latest cloud computing and machine learning as archaic and
irrelevant to today’s culture. I admit that I am a child of this very
generation, just look at the grammar of this blog post for proof. In all of
this rushing towards the future something very important is slowly being left
behind
The columnist Evgeny Morozov recently chose to focus his
cynical insight onto Silicon Valley recently. He did not write about one of the
college dropout phenomenon, nor one of the garage basement startups. He wrote
about the well-read-Ezra-Pound-quoting-Harvard-grad Tim O’Reilly.
In his introspective article on Tim O’Reilly, Evgeny Morozov
describes what he calls “The most dangerous man in Silicon Valley” having
gotten to his position not through ingenious and brilliant ideas (though
O’Reilly has both), these things do not set one apart from the masses in
silicon valley. O’Reilly used his humanities background from Harvard, his
knowledge of classics, his ability to quote Socrates. How many Silicon Valley
entrepreneurs do you think could quote The Art of War, arguably the most important treatise on business of all time?
O’Reilly’s knowledge of subjects outside of the slim field
of technology was enough to win him Silicon Valley. Sure this was not all it
took, but would he be where he is without it? In all the technological rush it
is even more important not to leave classical knowledge behind. We may still
technically be ‘taught’ these things in schools and universities, but our
society is no longer ‘learning’ them, they are slowly ceasing to recognize the
relevance of these things that are now, perhaps more than ever, important to
our world.
This was a very interesting post, and in many ways, I am struggling to balance my desire for classical knowledge as well as technological knowledge.
ReplyDeleteThere is a clear shift in our societal values that has been somewhat driven by the economy. Jobs are in technology. Therefore, students want to learn technology so that they can get jobs and be successful. Try to think of how you view your friends that have less technologically oriented majors. I have friends who are history majors, political science majors, communication majors, etc.. They may know more than me with regards to literature and history, but I will admit that I am guilty of thinking I am better off than them because I will get a job, and they will not. (It is very likely true that many people at Stevens feel the same way).
While we are more technologically oriented as a student body, we are forgetting the characteristics of our culture that make our culture unique, such as history and literature. While I hope that basic programming becomes a part of early education, I also hope they history and literature continues to be a part of it as well.
I definitely agree with this post. I would also point out that for young people seeking to become computer scientists reading and writing skills are highly important. Being a good programmer means much more than writing good code; it also means being good at documenting code, both through comments and written up documentation. That requires strong writing skills. Reading and writing are still among the most important subjects taught in schools, because they are valuable life skills and so many professions require you to be skilled at both.
ReplyDelete