I actually just happened to find this article
today
right before the email reminder about blog
posts this week, and it legitimately took my interest, because who doesn’t love
ganging up on Verizon for some of their more unsavory dealings these days? Not to mention I’m a customer of theirs.
So this brings me to the main point of the
article. How can a company as enormously
large as Verizon not only plan ahead and enter a certain IMEI code into
their system to allow Google’s new LTE Nexus 7 tablet to work on their
system while simultaneously advertising all over social networks and in general
about how they will allow access to their plan on it, then just go right back
on that and do absolutely no such thing?
It just baffles me.
Why say any of that in the first place?
As someone who doesn’t own the new Nexus, I couldn’t particularly care
less if they chose this particular tablet to just not work with, but it bothers
me as a consumer that they would go to the trouble of making all these claims
that they clearly had no intentions of ever following through with. Secondly, regardless of how much I care or
don’t care, it’s just plain illegal too:
(b) Use of devices and applications. Licensees
offering service on spectrum subject to this section shall not deny, limit, or restrict the
ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice on
the licensee’s C Block network, except:
(1) Insofar as such use would not be compliant with published technical standards reasonably necessary for the management or protection of the licensee’s network, or
(2) As required to comply with statute or applicable government regulation.
(1) Insofar as such use would not be compliant with published technical standards reasonably necessary for the management or protection of the licensee’s network, or
(2) As required to comply with statute or applicable government regulation.
and they seem not to care.
Third, even if for some reason they simply didn’t care about the
legality of it, they claimed themselves that they would never break this
particular rule; quoting Verizon VP Jim Gerace:
“Verizon Wireless—and all the other
participants in the recent 700 MHz spectrum auction—understood the FCC’s rules
for using that spectrum in advance of the auction. Of course we’ll abide by
those rules.”
Now, I understand that it’s been what, 3 days since this article
was posted? Maybe something’s happened already, maybe they’re really working on
it, maybe, I don’t know, something. But
if it’s not too cynical to say, I kinda doubt it.
Is it bureaucracy? Can nothing about it get
done because everyone is calling each other in a circle waiting on the next
person to do something for them? Possibly.
I somehow doubt they are doing this out of vindictiveness or something
else equally silly. But why choose this
product? Why deny users access to this
product, claiming it’s literally physically impossible for it to work on their
network, when a simple SIM card switch proves them wrong and to be liars? It’s a bit odd for me to be on the side of
AT&T on this issue, considering all the unlikeable things they’ve done over
the years.
Lastly, it’s a bit funny that I find this
article right after reading this past week’s assignment out of Professor Vinsel’s
new book, which focused a lot on the FCC and its regulations of these big
companies to make sure they were kept in line, didn’t do anything they shouldn’t,
take advantage of customers, or even those who aren’t their customers. Then here I find this article about Verizon
flagrantly ignoring both the FCC’s ruling on this issue, and their promise to
the FCC to follow it under every circumstance.
I’m gonna be keeping an eye out for what becomes of this issue, and I’ll
hope they do the right thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment