A monopoly is
classified as an enterprise that is the only seller of a certain product, thus
having no economic competition. During the early Twentieth Century, J.D.
Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, under the Sherman Antitrust Act, was
labeled as a monopoly since it owned most of the country’s and world’s oil
production and marketing business resulting it to be split into several
different companies, including today’s ExxonMobil, resembles its parent. As I
have analyzed it Google does not fall under this category, since almost all of
their services have a handful of competitors. Even though Google offers a large
variety of services, they tend to improve on a service that is already out
there and consider all their services to be in beta, with Gmail as the
exception, which was launch officially in 2004. Even their futuristic Google
Glass, which is currently in beta, has an opposition known as Jet, which was
created by Recon Instruments.
So there is no way that
Google is a monopoly, with them making a service when many other corporations
already offer it. Google is more of an experimenter than anything else since
what they do is spread themselves in. different fields and try to improve them.
Their products range from social networking with Google Plus, internet and
cable provider with Google Fiber, cell phones with the Google Nexus, laptops
with their Chromebook, and they even run a laboratory in California known as
Google X Lab. Google actually makes the lives of their consumers simpler by
syncing their data across all their devices through Gmail. This data can also
be downloaded through the Google Account Activity Report to be able to manage
and organize one’s information. On top of everything Google supports open
source and post the codes for their Android and Chromium operating systems
online as well as giving hints on how to modify and improve them for different
needs.
Currently the only
service that Google has, which may not have a competitor, is their augmented
reality game known as Ingress. Currently Ingress is only available for Android
devices and an activation code is needed to be able to play, even though the
app can be downloaded through the Google Play Store. But, even this does not make
them a monopoly because just like most of their other services Ingress is in
beta, is free of charge, and syncs with Gmail as well as ad free. In reality
the only difference that Ingress has from other video games is that it requires
players to go outside and play, instead of remaining stationary in a room. So I
may be that other mobile games and maybe even console games can be counted as a
competitor, even though those games one way or another try to make a profit off
of its consumers, whereas Google does not.
From personal experience I actually enjoy
using the services provided by Google. With Google Drive I am able to start an
assignment on my phone when I am not able to use my laptop and then later on
access the file on my laptop without having to send my email attachment or
tether my phone. Also, with Gmail syncing my bookmarks, history, and forms from
Google Chrome, I am able to access all my internet data from my cell phone,
laptop, and desktop with no problem. As I have said before I see that Google
actually makes everyone’s life easier by syncing the data from all their
services onto one account which can be access from any device that runs almost
any operating system. Google even has a sense of humor with their easter eggs
and annually pranks on some of their more widely used services such as Gmail
and YouTube, which adds another reason why I support them.
I definitely agree with your comments. In almost every market Google has a hand in, you can expect there to be a formidable opponent as competition. By no means do I believe Google is hindering any other competitor from using their product own products, but instead they are simply improving the standards in competition, as well as the user experience.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I still think it would be good to read some of the opposing views, such as Microsoft's stance, some of which can be found on the page http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2049804/Microsoft-Complaint-Outlines-6-Reasons-Why-Google-is-a-Monopoly. How do you feel about some of Microsoft's points? Something I would probably look more into is Google's operations in Europe, which apparently shows more signs of the company being a monopoly. However, I still highly disagree with most of Microsoft's accusations because they continue to copy a lot of Google's innovations, and I simply think that Google is providing a better user experience for almost all of its services. As you said, they like to experiment, which is why I love Google so much. By having so many subsidiaries, and by diving into so many different markets, they give themselves so many chances to innovate, and succeed.
Just because most of the population uses its services doesn't necessarily mean it's a monopoly, but maybe because it simply provides a better, and more convenient user experience.
Lastly, I think it's important to note that there are still formidable opponents to Google's operations, such as Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft, which all have their own niche in the market place that even Google can't compete with.
Google is both a Monopoly and not at the same time (schrodinger principle). They have their hand in many different fields even they might not be the only one in the field but seem to have a better product.
ReplyDeleteChrome OS: There is windows, linux (and Its flavors) and Mac.
Google Play (Android): CryogenMod, Replicant, Firefox OS, F-Droid
Chrome: IE, Opera, Safari, Firefox (and Its flavors)
Google.com: DuckDuckGo, Bing, Yahoo
Google Maps: Open Street Maps, Mapquest
Google Mail: Yahoo, Microsoft Live
The only thing is that Google most of the time makes a better product and since most people already an account with google it makes it easier to adopt it.
This makes it easy but also makes it a non forced monopoly.