The internet has grown from its once
humble origins of being a tool for academics and governments to
transmit information into one of the most ubiquitous pieces of
technology ever. At one point, the internet was a small community of
only a few hundred to thousands of people. Now, however, the internet
is more often a place of business than it is anything else. Even if
you're not going to a page or site and spending money, there is
likely someone making money off of your visit. Web advertisements
have become commonplace in today's web pages, for better or for
worse.
Web advertisements work in a couple of
ways. You can have static images on the side of a page. You could
have a banner ad running at the top and/or bottom portion of the
site. Many sites will change the background of the web page to be an
advertisement. Some sites will divert you to a page that is entirely
an advertisement. You need to sit at that page for a few seconds
before it lets you go to the content you wanted. Video based
advertisements are often considered the worst offenders of all. Video
sites such as Youtube will insert a video advertisement before the
video you're trying to watch. Sometimes they can be skipped after a
few seconds, but often they can not, and you're forced to wait
through a thirty second advertisement before you can watch a fifteen
second clip of a cat falling off of a building. Some sites with
articles are now adding advertisements to their lists of articles so
it looks like an advertisement is actual content.
These advertisements generate revenue
in different ways. Sometimes they work on the basis of
click-throughs. Every time somebody clicks the advertisement, it gets
counted. After a period of time (it could be weekly, monthly, daily)
the click-throughs are totaled and a payout is made based on the
total. Ads paid on a click-through model often attempt to look like
something else. You could go to download a piece of software and
think the download link is the big, green, flashing button that says
“DOWNLOAD NOW!”, when the download link is actually a small bit
of blue text down below it. These ads are deceptive and especially
annoying to deal with. Other ads might be monetized based on actual
or expected viewers, similar to television ads. If a company
regularly gets a certain amount of views to their front page, they
would charge a certain rate for the advertisement spot. It wouldn't
matter how many people click the advertisement, but they would see it
anyways.
The combination of the prevalence and
annoyance of advertisements on web pages has led to the development
of software designed specifically to block them. The most prolific of
these softwares are Adblock and Adblock Plus (which come from two
separate companies). These are web browser add-ons that eliminate
damn near all of the advertisements that pages display. This often
makes browsing sites much cleaner and easier, in addition to less
time spent waiting for some content. End users like these add-ons
because it simplifies the pages and gives them just what they want to
see without the extra fluff that the advertisements provide. The
owners of web sites don't like them as much, as it can take away from
the revenue stream. If a business is just a web site, then the
advertisements may be a large percent of their income.
Sites go about dealing with ad blocking
in a number of different ways. The worst way that I've seen ad
blocking dealt with is by refusing to display the content or page
while the advertisements are blocked. This is a very direct way of
dealing with the issue, but is also very heavy handed and pushy. I'd
be likely to just close the page and forget about what I was going to
do there. Another very direct way, but nowhere near as pushy, is to
display images in the advertisement spaces. Some sites put images
where the advertisements would go saying things like “Hey, we see
you're using blocking our ads.” This raises the issue of blocking
the advertisements to the user, but doesn't negatively impact them.
Sometimes they'll even request that people not use the ad blockers
with the space.
Some sites are looking into other
methods of dealing with advertisement averse users. Some sites now
offer paid subscriptions that offer additional on-site benefits,
often including not showing advertisements. Major gaming blog
Destructoid, along with its partner blogs, recently introduced their
paid membership, known as Huge. Paid members get an altered site
layout that is wider than normal since it doesn't need to deal with
the advertisement space. Reddit has been experimenting with Reddit
Gold for some months now, offering a reddit free of ads with the
subscription. Both of these sites are still completely usable with
the blockers on, and the subscriptions don't cost much per month
(just $3 a piece or $30 for a year).
I think that the paid membership with
additional benefits is the best route to go. It's not particularly
pushy or rude, and it doesn't make the sites any worse for those
without the membership. Quite often, simply asking someone to turn of
the blockers can be successful if the site doesn't have obnoxious
advertisements anyways.
Good post! I've always been a proponent of "paid membership" plans as an alternative to advertisements. A lot of people visit websites on an irregular basis or even just one-off, but the the people who are willing to support the services that they regularly use should have this option.
ReplyDeletethat being said I don't mind advertising on the web. Sitting though previews at movies and commercials on TV are already taken for granted. Seeing advertisements is a price I'm more than willing to pay for all the content made available online.
Nice post, George. There was a pretty good segment on this topic on On the Media a few weeks ago: http://www.onthemedia.org/2013/aug/30/ads-vs-ad-blockers/
ReplyDeleteLike Josh, I prefer subscription models, too. Netflix, Spotify, it's all great. I wish there was an equivalent for comic books.
Nice post, George. There was a pretty good segment on this topic on On the Media a few weeks ago: http://www.onthemedia.org/2013/aug/30/ads-vs-ad-blockers/
ReplyDeleteLike Josh, I prefer subscription models, too. Netflix, Spotify, it's all great. I wish there was an equivalent for comic books.
I'm very against any sort of ad blocker. Both as someone who makes money from advertisements, and also someone who understands that people make money from those ads for things that I choose to watch/read. I agree that no ads should be obnoxious, or get in the way of content. However your "30 seconds of ads for a 15 second cat video" is an example I have literally never seen. Normally those category of videos don't have ads, or only use the banner. And either way, the uploader, not the service, chooses no allow full video ads vs banner or none.
ReplyDeleteFor anyone who hasn't seen a good example of replacing blocked ad space with messages, the dating site OkCupid has some fun messages asking people to donate: http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/23/okcupid-ad-blocker/
And I totally agree that subscription model is the best bet, and the way of the future, if its done right. Some YouTube creators that offer free and education content have started this on their own, outside of any larger service like YouTube. They do this so they can keep their content up for free and continue to make it. I believe they still have ads on videos, but I think they plan to discontinue that if the subscription project becomes successful. https://subbable.com/