In the Edward Snowden
leaks more than just information about the NSA was released. Information about other countries surveillance
agencies were released, one of which was the United Kingdom’s. On September 25, 2015 The Intercept, a
British news outlet, released more than two dozen documents about the UK’s surveillance
programs. The major program that was
revealed was called “Karma Police.” “Karma
Police” was an extensive program that had many different aspects from creating
profiles of people’s internet activity to analyzing communications between
people. The program also documented “suspicious”
google searches and google map searches. The program had the legal ability to spy on
people from the UK as well as other countries including the U.S. and a total of
185 countries. The program was reportedly
thought up and designed in 2007 or 2008 and implemented in 2009.
One of the ways that the
surveillance program collected data was by targeting internet radio sites that
played excerpts from the Quran. They then
track anybody who listens to the site and finds there information for social
media and internet communications sites.
They then would collect all of the data that was found on the people and
create profiles on them so that they could easily track all of the people’s
movements.
The UK was able to spy
on all the countries they had been spying on because of their location. Being located in between Europe and North
America 25 percent of the world’s internet traffic runs through the UK through
1600 different cables. “Karma Police” would survey most of the cables and
select which cables were most valuable and then monitor those selected cables
with the most precision.
The major issue with
having this kind of surveillance in place is that there seems to be a large
amount of loopholes and ways for the government to get away with spying on
their own citizens. The English parliament
had been made aware of the loopholes that were being used and very quietly
dismissed the issue and nothing was done about it. This is interesting to me because in the U.S.
people seem to be fairly angry about the spying that the NSA was doing and in
England parliaments entire Security Council just let it be and accepted it for
being the best option. In the U.S. what
was done was against the law and in England it was technically legal. In my opinion if the spying is being done legally
then there are more issues than if it is being done illegally. The reason I believe this is that the fact
that doing this kind of thing is legal is much more like a surveillance state
than if it is illegal because if this kind of thing is legal it is much more
likely to grow and become a more involved surveillance program.
Source:
https://theintercept.com/2015/09/25/gchq-radio-porn-spies-track-web-users-online-identities/
No comments:
Post a Comment