The popular mobile social media application Snapchat has already
been the subject of scrutiny mainly because of the fact that snaps don’t
actually disappear once they have been viewed. In its own privacy policy,
Snapchat says, “We cannot guarantee that deletion always occurs within a particular
time frame.” Now Snapchat is in the spotlight again for sharing snaps with the local
police force.
There are two conditions, however – the snaps can’t have
been opened by the intended recipient yet, and law enforcement needs to have a
warrant. Snapchat has only turned over snaps about a dozen times between May and
October 2013. The reason why the police
can only see unopened snaps is because the snaps are supposed to be deleted
from Snapchat’s servers once they are opened. Unopened snaps are stored until
viewed or for 30 days if not opened. With a warrant, Snapchat can send the ones
still on those servers to the police. Snaps that have been added to users’ My
Stories are a different beast. Unless the snaps are deleted by the user, they
remain on the server for 24 hours, even after they have been viewed. Any images
still on a Snapchat server can be requested to be viewed by law enforcement.
What’s more, snaps can also be kept after their expiration date if the police express
interest but cannot get a warrant to view the snap until later.
According to Micah Shaffer, head of “trust and safety” at
Snapchat, their compliance with the police is keeping with the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which “obliges us to produce the snaps to
the requesting law enforcement agency.”
This is all well and good until the police violate the ECPA
or Snapchat’s privacy policy or even step into a gray area. My roommate, whose
father is a deputy chief of their local precinct, has been questioned by her
father regarding snaps he has seen on her My Story. I do not believe that he
obtained a warrant to open his daughter’s My Story, but if he is her father, is
it more acceptable?
In Birmingham, England, the West Midlands Police (WMP) Department
actually has its own Snapchat account and sends followers “a hodgepodge of
missing person’s posters and meme-y PSAs.” Even though in this case you have to
be friends with WMP on Snapchat to receive the snaps and view their My Story,
my concern is that someday the police will become a sponsored My Story on
everyone’s feed. This has some benefits – alerts of crimes, road closures, etc.
– but most of those benefits can be achieved in other more efficient manners. These
two cases serve as examples that online activities are eventually surveyed by “Big
Brother”
The whole Snapchat situation is simply the NSA on a smaller
scale. We, as citizens, are not really sure what the police and the NSA are
looking for when they scan our emails and snaps. Schaffer only vaguely answered
this concern when he said “there are times when we . . . are permitted and
sometimes compelled by law to access and disclose information.” Not knowing
what the police or NSA are searching for turns this into a typical “big brother”
case. I understand the need of law enforcement and the NSA to keep their
citizen’s safe, but there are lines that must not be crossed, including taking
advantage of the system by violating the privacy of your daughter just to make
sure she’s succeeded in college.
No comments:
Post a Comment