Personal drones in the form of multi-rotor aircrafts or
autonomous model planes are becoming cheaper and easier to obtain. As drones
become more popular, more people are beginning to fear their permanent presence
in the sky and some have called for stricter laws and regulations to help ban
drones. This
article mentions one piece of legislation that would require hobbyist and
drone enthusiast to obtain a pilot license and get their drone certified before
they would be allowed to fly in designated areas. The drone pilot license would
be similar to a real pilot license in that it would require an examination and
test to verify the would-be pilot is capable of flying his or her drone in a
safe manor. In addition to the license test, the drone would need to be inspected
and certified before it could be flown by a licensed pilot. The pilot license
would cost some amount of money, not to mention the cost of any training or
lessons to aid in passing the test. Additionally the certification would likely
require a drone enthusiast to ship off their drone to get certified, the cost
associated with this could be enormous considering the size of some drones and
will likely take some time. These added expenses are outrageous especially
considering drones are not cheap to begin with.
The more
disturbing issue is the lack of knowledge those who are proposing such
regulations have about drones. The
article mentions one legislator who was shocked to see her rose garden on
the internet curtesy of Google maps, and believes the images where actually
taken by drones. The fact that people with little knowledge of the science and
operation of drones are in positions to pass legislation and regulations on
drones is bad news for hobbyist.
Drone
companies like DJI are willing to cooperate with laws and regulations. DJI’s
new firmware update includes a list of restricted flight areas, the autopilot
system uses this list and GPS technology to automatically avoid flying in
restricted areas. DJI has also implemented various failsafe features into their
drones and auto pilots systems that aid the pilot in emergency situations.
For many
this is not enough, they still believe their safety and privacy is being
compromised by drones. I do not understand why drones are being singled out, it
is much easier and cheaper to use a camera and fancy lens to invade someone’s
privacy rather than a noisy drone. As for safety, you are more likely to be
killed by a commercial airliner falling from the sky, than by a drone. Passing
regulations and laws against drones just makes it more expensive for hobbyist
to fly. Are these laws fair to those who already own drones, are they expected
to go out and pay money to obtain a license and get their drone certified.
Perhaps the largest issue with this is the classification of the word ‘Drone’.
Is a kid who receives a $20 toy helicopter on Christmas expected to go out and
get it certified, the concept is simply outrageous.
No comments:
Post a Comment