Launched in 1997 the google search
engine has become the most widely used search engine in the world. Approximately
65% of all searches made come from the internet giant. Initially, as a search
engine, Google, only displayed results that lead to webpages. These results are
based on the amount of links to a website. The more links to it the more
popular it was believed to be and the higher it was placed in Google’s queue.
The search engine then began evolving. It started adding built in functions to
improve the user experience. These tools include a translator, dictionary,
calculator, unit converter, and others. While these built in tools are convenient
and helpful; it is clear that Google was moving away from just being a search engine.
Then something happened behind the
scenes, search algorithms specific to every individual. Google’s search engine tailors
a person’s results based on their preferences if they are signed in to their Gmail
or google account. However even if they aren’t, Google still uses 57 signals
from your connection such as your location, the browser you’re using, and the
computer being used to tailor your results. AS Pariser said in his Ted Talk
about filter bubbles, the internet is now deciding what it thinks we should
see. Well these search algorithms just rearranged the top results into links
that mirrored our interests or views. Now, google is trying to come up with a
new way to control what appears on the first page.
Google is currently working on a fact checking
system that will check the mount of truthfulness on a site and rank it based on
that. This system would tap into Google’s Knowledge Vault of all facts that
Google has collected from the internet. According to Google, all these facts
have been unanimously verified and are to be considered truth. The new system
will compare all the information on the site against what is in the Vault and
any site with few contradictions would be considered trust worthy. Google will
be assigning a Knowledge-Based Trust score to each site based on how truthful
the site is deemed to be. Google reports that initial testing on a small set of
sites has proven the algorithm effective.
So let’s
look to the future. One in which, google not only chooses what it thinks we should
see but it also tells us how true a site is. If used only on empirical data or
on facts that can’t be disputed then this new model could be very effective. It
would help lower the number of people getting mislead by false information and make
fact checking a much smaller process, if anyone would still do it. However, I
feel that a generation that is introduced to Google with this built in
knowledge base would easily fall prey to it. Blindly trusting Google’s truthfulness
rating could lead to getting wrong information, or at least the inability to
double check the information. It might start as a very accommodating tool but
who knows where it will lead. No one saw the search algorithms being inserted
into Google’s core, and now they tell us what we should see. What if Google
sees you’re a smoker advertises for NicoDerm (nicotine patches), could they not
easily pass you studies that say electronic cigarettes are the worse
alternative to nicotine patches? Couldn’t
Google easily raise the truthfulness of a site or article if they had a sponsor
that would pay them lots of money for it? As we are becoming more and more
reliant on technology we should keep in mind who should be in control.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22530102.600-google-wants-to-rank-websites-based-on-facts-not-links.html#.VPXTmfnF_4I
While I agree that such over-assistance has the possibility to impede on future generations ability to verify information. However, so long as schools continue to enforce the ability to do so I can't see it becoming a problem. Furthermore, most serious research requires information that simply can't be found on the internet so it is still necessary to use paperback resources. More importantly tho I can't foresee Google taking bribes from companies to improve the chances of their website appearing in a search. The reason isn't because of my faith in Google but my faith in their greed. While seemingly counter intuitive it is logical because the majority of Google's revenue, as far as I know, comes from advertisements; advertisements requires people to use the search engine. People won't want to use their search engine if all of the results are horribly skewed. Furthermore, if people stop using their search engine they may stop using their other products. Not to mention the majority of their credibility and profit comes from their reputation, if they tarnish it they're sure to see both plummet. It would be in Google's best interest to continue providing the best results.
ReplyDelete