With all
the news and buzz in regards to net neutrality that has been going on in the
past week or so, I came across a pretty interesting article that discusses the
Deep Web. For those of you that have never heard of this or just don’t know
what it is, the Deep Web is the portion of the World Wide Web content that is
not indexed by the standard search engines. Then there are multiple subsections
of the Deep Web like Darknet for example. Darknet is basically a private network
where connections are made only between trusted peers, sometimes referred to as
“friends,” using non-standard protocols and ports. One of the most famous
networks within the Darknet is Tor, which is a free software for enabling
anonymous communications. What’s wrong with that you may ask; when you are
able to direct Internet traffic through a “free, worldwide, volunteer
network consisting of more than six thousand relays to conceal a user's
location and usage from anyone conducting network surveillance or traffic
analysis,” concerns can be raised. These are concerns from prosecutors and
government agencies that see this as a haven for serious criminality.
One
of these government agencies that has taken notice and are attempting to do
something about it is the United Kingdom.
Although the Parliamentary advisers understand that networks such as Tor
could be used in the public interest, they are more concerned with the criminal
ends. With the recent up rise
in successful and stopped terrorism attacks that have been happening all around the
world, a lot of concern has been raised too. David Cameron, the Prime Minister
of the UK, wants to be able to take charge of this concern and prevent any other attacks that could happen. He states,
“There should be no means of communication the security services could not
read.” He then goes on to say, “The question remains, ‘Are we going to allow a
means of communications where it simply is not possibly to do that?’ My answer
to that question is, ‘No, we must not.’”
Unfortunately
for the UK, Prime Minister Cameron does not have too much knowledge about the
subject of the internet or Dark Web. One expert stated that the plan is “noble” but highly and ultimately
unworkable. One of the reasons this plan is unworkable is due to the
“widespread agreement that banning online anonymity systems altogether is not
seen as an acceptable policy option in the UK.” As far as the technical
difficulties, it would be almost impossible.
A
report recently published cited the example of the Chinese government, which
attempted to block access to Tor in order to enforce bans on unauthorized
websites. Basically what happened was that the body that maintains the network
simply added “bridges” that were “very difficult to block”, which ultimately
allowed people to continue accessing Tor. The report then went on to say,
“computer experts argue that any legislative attempt to preclude Tor
Hidden Services from being available in the UK would be technologically
infeasible.”
Although
Prime Minister Cameron has only the best intentions in mind, it looks like he should brush up on his knowledge of the internet because it is not going to go his way.
No comments:
Post a Comment